AI Rate CardQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Ember-1: API price and specs
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 65% cheaper than Ember-1 on input price.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 92% cheaper than Ember-1 on output price.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 78% cheaper than Ember-1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Ember-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $1.05 | $3.00 +184.4% |
| Median input, per 1M | $2.00 | $3.00 +50% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.20 | $15.00 +1150% |
| Median output, per 1M | $6.00 | $15.00 +150% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $1.29 | $6.00 +363.3% |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 262K +75% | 1M |
| Providers | 25 | 7 +72% |
| Regions | CN, EU, GLOBAL, US | US |
| Accepts | image, text | image, text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | trustedrouter | edenai |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aiml, edenai, fireworks-ai, impossibl, kilo, openrouter, vercel
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Ember-1?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 65% cheaper than Ember-1 on input price. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 92% cheaper than Ember-1 on output price. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 78% cheaper than Ember-1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Ember-1?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1M tokens; Ember-1: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Ember-1?
aiml, edenai, fireworks-ai, impossibl, kilo, openrouter, vercel