AI Rate CardQwen3.8 Flash vs Ling-2.6-flash: API price and specs
Ling-2.6-flash is 87% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on input price.
Ling-2.6-flash is 87% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on output price.
Ling-2.6-flash is 87% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3.8 Flash has a 300% larger context than Ling-2.6-flash.
| Field | Qwen3.8 Flash | Ling-2.6-flash |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.0975 +650% | $0.013 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.15 +50% | $0.10 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.31 +683.3% | $0.039 |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.47 +56.7% | $0.30 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.16 +662.5% | $0.0208 |
| Context | 1M | 262K +75% |
| Max output | 131K | 33K +75% |
| Providers | 27 | 5 +81.5% |
| Regions | GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | file, image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | edenai | aiml |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aiml, jiekou, opencode, requesty, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Flash or Ling-2.6-flash?
Ling-2.6-flash is 87% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on input price. Ling-2.6-flash is 87% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on output price. Ling-2.6-flash is 87% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 Flash or Ling-2.6-flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash: 1M tokens; Ling-2.6-flash: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.8 Flash and Ling-2.6-flash?
aiml, jiekou, opencode, requesty, zenmux