AI Rate CardQwen-Image-3.0 vs Grok Imagine Image 2.0: API price and specs
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 is 50% cheaper than Qwen-Image-3.0 on input price.
| Field | Qwen-Image-3.0 | Grok Imagine Image 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $2.00 +100% | $1.00 |
| Median input, per 1M | $2.00 +100% | $1.00 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | — | $1.00 |
| Median output, per 1M | — | $1.00 |
| Lowest unit price | $0.024 / image | $0.048 / image +100% |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | — | $1.20 |
| Context | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Providers | 3 +25% | 4 |
| Regions | — | — |
| Accepts | image, text | image, text |
| Returns | image | image |
| Type | Images | Images |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | aihubmix | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aihubmix, cometapi, empiriolabs
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen-Image-3.0 or Grok Imagine Image 2.0?
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 is 50% cheaper than Qwen-Image-3.0 on input price.
Where can I use both Qwen-Image-3.0 and Grok Imagine Image 2.0?
aihubmix, cometapi, empiriolabs