AI Rate Card

Llama-Guard-3-8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: API price and specs

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 9% cheaper than Llama-Guard-3-8B on input price.

Llama-Guard-3-8B is 80% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on output price.

Llama-Guard-3-8B is 24% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

FieldLlama-Guard-3-8BNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Lowest input, per 1M$0.055 +10%$0.05
Median input, per 1M$0.27 +34.8%$0.20
Lowest output, per 1M$0.03$0.15 +400%
Median output, per 1M$0.0425$0.20 +370.6%
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.061$0.08 +31.1%
Context131K131K
Max output131K131K
Providers3 +70%10
RegionsGLOBAL, USUS
Acceptstextimage, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, text
Returnstexttext
TypeModerationModeration
Free optionnoyes
Cheapest providerdeepinfravultr

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

deepinfra, edenai

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Llama-Guard-3-8B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 9% cheaper than Llama-Guard-3-8B on input price. Llama-Guard-3-8B is 80% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on output price. Llama-Guard-3-8B is 24% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Llama-Guard-3-8B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Llama-Guard-3-8B: 131K tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131K tokens.

Where can I use both Llama-Guard-3-8B and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

deepinfra, edenai