DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3: API price and specs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 76% cheaper than GLM-5.3 on input price.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 77% cheaper than GLM-5.3 on output price.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 76% cheaper than GLM-5.3 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.045 | $0.19 +322% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.30 | $1.40 +366.7% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.15 | $0.64 +326.7% |
| Median output, per 1M | $1.20 | $4.40 +266.7% |
| Lowest unit price | — | $0.033 / request |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.075 | $0.32 +323.9% |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 1M +0.1% | 1M |
| Providers | 60 +9.1% | 66 |
| Regions | APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US | APAC, EU, FI, GLOBAL, US |
| Accepts | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text | file, image, text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | yes | yes |
| Cheapest provider | openrouter | trustedrouter |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
302ai, abacus, aiand, aihubmix, aiml, aki-io, baseten, cometapi, cortecs, deepinfra, digitalocean, edenai, empiriolabs, fastrouter, fireworks-ai, huggingface, hyper, impossibl, inco, inferx, io-net, iteracompute, jiekou, kenari, kilo, meganova, melious, mixlayer, moark, modal, nearai, nebius, neuralwatt, novita, nvidia, ofox, ollama, ollama-cloud, opencode, openrouter, poe, requesty, runinfra, siliconflow, synthetic, tensorx, tinfoil, togetherai, trustedrouter, umans-ai, umans-ai-coding-plan, vercel, vultr, wafer.ai, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM-5.3?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 76% cheaper than GLM-5.3 on input price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 77% cheaper than GLM-5.3 on output price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 76% cheaper than GLM-5.3 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM-5.3?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1M tokens; GLM-5.3: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3?
302ai, abacus, aiand, aihubmix, aiml, aki-io, baseten, cometapi, cortecs, deepinfra, digitalocean, edenai, empiriolabs, fastrouter, fireworks-ai, huggingface, hyper, impossibl, inco, inferx, io-net, iteracompute, jiekou, kenari, kilo, meganova, melious, mixlayer, moark, modal, nearai, nebius, neuralwatt, novita, nvidia, ofox, ollama, ollama-cloud, opencode, openrouter, poe, requesty, runinfra, siliconflow, synthetic, tensorx, tinfoil, togetherai, trustedrouter, umans-ai, umans-ai-coding-plan, vercel, vultr, wafer.ai, zenmux