AI Rate CardDeepSeek-R1 vs Kimi K2.5: API price and specs
DeepSeek-R1 is 33% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on input price.
DeepSeek-R1 is 22% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Kimi K2.5 has a 59.8% larger context than DeepSeek-R1.
| Field | DeepSeek-R1 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.30 | $0.45 +50% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.72 +19.9% | $0.60 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.20 | $1.20 |
| Median output, per 1M | $2.50 | $3.00 +20% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.54 | $0.69 +27.8% |
| Context | 164K +37.4% | 262K |
| Max output | 164K +37.4% | 262K |
| Providers | 17 +55.3% | 38 |
| Regions | US | EU, GLOBAL, US |
| Accepts | text | image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/heif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text, video, video/3gpp, video/avi, video/mov, video/mp4, video/mpeg, video/mpg, video/webm, video/wmv, video/x-flv |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | aiml | deepinfra |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aiml, azure, deepinfra, edenai, fastrouter, huggingface, kilo, novita, openrouter, qiniu-ai, requesty, siliconflow, trustedrouter, vercel
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1 or Kimi K2.5?
DeepSeek-R1 is 33% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on input price. DeepSeek-R1 is 22% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, DeepSeek-R1 or Kimi K2.5?
DeepSeek-R1: 164K tokens; Kimi K2.5: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both DeepSeek-R1 and Kimi K2.5?
aiml, azure, deepinfra, edenai, fastrouter, huggingface, kilo, novita, openrouter, qiniu-ai, requesty, siliconflow, trustedrouter, vercel