Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GLM-5.3: API price and specs

GLM-5.3 is 82% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price.

GLM-5.3 is 47% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on output price.

GLM-5.3 is 75% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Field	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B	GLM-5.3
Lowest input, per 1M	$1.05 +455.6%	$0.19
Median input, per 1M	$2.00 +42.9%	$1.40
Lowest output, per 1M	$1.20 +87.5%	$0.64
Median output, per 1M	$6.00 +36.4%	$4.40
Lowest unit price	—	$0.033 / request
Cost of 1M in + 200k out	$1.29 +307.4%	$0.32
Context	1M	1M
Max output	262K +75%	1M
Providers	25 +62.1%	66
Regions	CN, EU, GLOBAL, US	APAC, EU, FI, GLOBAL, US
Accepts	image, text	file, image, text
Returns	text	text
Type	Text models	Text models
Free option	no	yes
Cheapest provider	trustedrouter	trustedrouter

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aihubmix, aiml, cortecs, deepinfra, edenai, fireworks-ai, huggingface, hyper, impossibl, iteracompute, jiekou, kilo, meganova, modal, novita, openrouter, poe, requesty, runinfra, siliconflow, tensorx, togetherai, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is 82% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price. GLM-5.3 is 47% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on output price. GLM-5.3 is 75% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or GLM-5.3?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1M tokens; GLM-5.3: 1M tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and GLM-5.3?