AI Rate CardQwen3.7 Plus vs Muse Ember: API price and specs
Muse Ember is 56% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on input price.
Muse Ember is 46% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on output price.
Muse Ember is 51% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3.7 Plus has a 1.5% larger context than Muse Ember.
| Field | Qwen3.7 Plus | Muse Ember |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.23 +128% | $0.10 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.32 +220% | $0.10 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.92 +84% | $0.50 |
| Median output, per 1M | $1.28 +156% | $0.50 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.41 +106% | $0.20 |
| Context | 1.1M | 1M +1.4% |
| Max output | 131K +86.1% | 944K |
| Providers | 24 | 3 +87.5% |
| Regions | GLOBAL | — |
| Accepts | file, image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | audio, file, image, pdf, text, video |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | 302ai | fastrouter |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Muse Ember?
Muse Ember is 56% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on input price. Muse Ember is 46% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on output price. Muse Ember is 51% cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.7 Plus or Muse Ember?
Qwen3.7 Plus: 1.1M tokens; Muse Ember: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.7 Plus and Muse Ember?
fastrouter, kenari, kilo