AI Rate CardQwen3.6 27B vs Muse Ember: API price and specs
Qwen3.6 27B is 75% cheaper than Muse Ember on input price.
Qwen3.6 27B is 44% cheaper than Muse Ember on output price.
Qwen3.6 27B is 60% cheaper than Muse Ember on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Muse Ember has a 300% larger context than Qwen3.6 27B.
| Field | Qwen3.6 27B | Muse Ember |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.025 | $0.10 +300% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.39 +290% | $0.10 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.28 | $0.50 +78.6% |
| Median output, per 1M | $3.20 +540% | $0.50 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.081 | $0.20 +146.9% |
| Context | 262K +75% | 1M |
| Max output | 262K +72.2% | 944K |
| Providers | 28 | 3 +89.3% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | application/pdf, audio, file, image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/webm | audio, file, image, pdf, text, video |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | inferx | fastrouter |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B or Muse Ember?
Qwen3.6 27B is 75% cheaper than Muse Ember on input price. Qwen3.6 27B is 44% cheaper than Muse Ember on output price. Qwen3.6 27B is 60% cheaper than Muse Ember on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.6 27B or Muse Ember?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262K tokens; Muse Ember: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.6 27B and Muse Ember?
fastrouter, kenari, kilo