AI Rate CardQwen3 Coder Plus vs Ling-2.6-1T: API price and specs
Ling-2.6-1T is 42% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Plus on input price.
Qwen3 Coder Plus is 14% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on output price.
Ling-2.6-1T is 16% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Plus on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3 Coder Plus has a 300% larger context than Ling-2.6-1T.
| Field | Qwen3 Coder Plus | Ling-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.52 +73.3% | $0.30 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.80 +166.5% | $0.30 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $2.16 | $2.50 +15.7% |
| Median output, per 1M | $3.80 +52% | $2.50 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.95 +19% | $0.80 |
| Context | 1M | 262K +75% |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Providers | 10 | 2 +80% |
| Regions | — | — |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | cometapi | requesty |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Ling-2.6-1T?
Ling-2.6-1T is 42% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Plus on input price. Qwen3 Coder Plus is 14% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on output price. Ling-2.6-1T is 16% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Plus on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3 Coder Plus or Ling-2.6-1T?
Qwen3 Coder Plus: 1M tokens; Ling-2.6-1T: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3 Coder Plus and Ling-2.6-1T?
requesty, zenmux