AI Rate CardQwen3 32B vs ERNIE-5.0-Thinking: API price and specs
Qwen3 32B is 89% cheaper than ERNIE-5.0-Thinking on input price.
Qwen3 32B is 91% cheaper than ERNIE-5.0-Thinking on output price.
Qwen3 32B is 90% cheaper than ERNIE-5.0-Thinking on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3 32B has a 10.1% larger context than ERNIE-5.0-Thinking.
| Field | Qwen3 32B | ERNIE-5.0-Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.064 | $0.60 +836.7% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.10 | $0.82 +690.3% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.22 | $2.40 +970.5% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.45 | $3.29 +630.6% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.11 | $1.08 +891.8% |
| Context | 131K | 119K +9.2% |
| Max output | 131K | 66K +50% |
| Providers | 22 | 3 +86.4% |
| Regions | EU, US | — |
| Accepts | text | image, text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | requesty | moark |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B or ERNIE-5.0-Thinking?
Qwen3 32B is 89% cheaper than ERNIE-5.0-Thinking on input price. Qwen3 32B is 91% cheaper than ERNIE-5.0-Thinking on output price. Qwen3 32B is 90% cheaper than ERNIE-5.0-Thinking on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3 32B or ERNIE-5.0-Thinking?
Qwen3 32B: 131K tokens; ERNIE-5.0-Thinking: 119K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3 32B and ERNIE-5.0-Thinking?
aihubmix, aiml, moark