AI Rate CardQwen3 14B vs inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0: API price and specs
Qwen3 14B is 49% cheaper than inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 on input price.
Qwen3 14B is 58% cheaper than inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 on output price.
Qwen3 14B is 53% cheaper than inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen3 14B | inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.07 | $0.14 +94.3% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.12 | $0.14 +15% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.23 | $0.54 +138.6% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.24 | $0.56 +132.1% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.12 | $0.24 +111.8% |
| Context | 131K | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Providers | 12 | 2 +83.3% |
| Regions | EU, US | — |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | siliconflow | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 14B or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
Qwen3 14B is 49% cheaper than inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 on input price. Qwen3 14B is 58% cheaper than inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 on output price. Qwen3 14B is 53% cheaper than inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3 14B or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
Qwen3 14B: 131K tokens; inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0: 131K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3 14B and inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
aihubmix, siliconflow