AI Rate CardQwen 2.5 72B Instruct vs inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0: API price and specs
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is 41% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on input price.
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 26% cheaper than inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 on output price.
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is 21% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct has a 0.1% larger context than inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0.
| Field | Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct | inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.23 +69.1% | $0.14 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.36 +160.9% | $0.14 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.40 | $0.54 +36% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.40 | $0.56 +39.2% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.31 +26.6% | $0.24 |
| Context | 131K | 131K +0.1% |
| Max output | 16K +87.5% | 131K |
| Providers | 11 | 2 +81.8% |
| Regions | US | — |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | requesty | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is 41% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on input price. Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 26% cheaper than inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 on output price. inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is 21% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct: 131K tokens; inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0: 131K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct and inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
aihubmix, siliconflow