AI Rate Card

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct vs Command R: API price and specs

Command R is 35% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on input price.

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 33% cheaper than Command R on output price.

Command R is 13% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct has a 2.4% larger context than Command R.

FieldQwen 2.5 72B InstructCommand R
Lowest input, per 1M$0.23 +53.3%$0.15
Median input, per 1M$0.36 +140%$0.15
Lowest output, per 1M$0.40$0.60 +50%
Median output, per 1M$0.40$0.60 +50%
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.31 +14.8%$0.27
Context131K128K +2.3%
Max output16K4K +75.6%
Providers114 +63.6%
RegionsUSUS
Acceptstexttext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providerrequestyedenai

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aihubmix, edenai, kilo, openrouter

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or Command R?

Command R is 35% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on input price. Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 33% cheaper than Command R on output price. Command R is 13% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or Command R?

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct: 131K tokens; Command R: 128K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct and Command R?

aihubmix, edenai, kilo, openrouter