AI Rate Card

Step 3.5 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash: API price and specs

Step 3.5 Flash is 53% cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on input price.

Step 3.5 Flash is 74% cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on output price.

Step 3.5 Flash is 64% cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

FieldStep 3.5 FlashStep 3.7 Flash
Lowest input, per 1M$0.09$0.19 +111.1%
Median input, per 1M$0.10$0.20 +100%
Lowest output, per 1M$0.30$1.14 +280%
Median output, per 1M$0.30$1.15 +283.3%
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.15$0.42 +178.7%
Context262K262K
Max output262K +0.1%262K
Providers13 +31.6%19
RegionsUSGLOBAL, US
Acceptstextfile, image, text, video
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providerdeepinfraambient

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aihubmix, deepinfra, edenai, empiriolabs, huggingface, kilo, openrouter, stepfun, stepfun-ai, trustedrouter, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Step 3.5 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is 53% cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on input price. Step 3.5 Flash is 74% cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on output price. Step 3.5 Flash is 64% cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Step 3.5 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash: 262K tokens; Step 3.7 Flash: 262K tokens.

Where can I use both Step 3.5 Flash and Step 3.7 Flash?

aihubmix, deepinfra, edenai, empiriolabs, huggingface, kilo, openrouter, stepfun, stepfun-ai, trustedrouter, zenmux