AI Rate CardDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5: API price and specs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 60% cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 on input price.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 33% cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 on output price.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 52% cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
MiMo-V2.5 has a 0.1% larger context than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
| Field | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.045 | $0.11 +148.9% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.30 +102.5% | $0.15 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.15 | $0.22 +49.3% |
| Median output, per 1M | $1.20 +305.1% | $0.30 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.075 | $0.16 +109.1% |
| Context | 1M +0.1% | 1.1M |
| Max output | 1M | 131K +87.5% |
| Providers | 60 | 22 +63.3% |
| Regions | APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US | US |
| Accepts | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text | audio, audio/flac, audio/mp4, audio/mpeg, audio/ogg, audio/wav, image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | yes | yes |
| Cheapest provider | openrouter | cometapi |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aihubmix, aiml, cometapi, deepinfra, edenai, empiriolabs, huggingface, impossibl, io-net, kenari, kilo, meganova, novita, opencode-go, openrouter, poe, requesty, standardcompute, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.5?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 60% cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 on input price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 33% cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 on output price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 52% cheaper than MiMo-V2.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.5?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1M tokens; MiMo-V2.5: 1.1M tokens.
Where can I use both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiMo-V2.5?
aihubmix, aiml, cometapi, deepinfra, edenai, empiriolabs, huggingface, impossibl, io-net, kenari, kilo, meganova, novita, opencode-go, openrouter, poe, requesty, standardcompute, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux