DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: API price and specs

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 62% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro on input price.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 72% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro on output price.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 66% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

DeepSeek V4 Pro has a 300% larger context than Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Field	DeepSeek V4 Pro	Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Lowest input, per 1M	$0.16 +163.8%	$0.06
Median input, per 1M	$1.50 +2402.7%	$0.06
Lowest output, per 1M	$0.63 +251.7%	$0.18
Median output, per 1M	$3.25 +1705.6%	$0.18
Lowest unit price	—	—
Cost of 1M in + 200k out	$0.28 +196.7%	$0.096
Context	1M	262K +75%
Max output	1M	33K +96.9%
Providers	44	11 +75%
Regions	APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US	US
Accepts	file, text	image, text, video
Returns	text	text
Type	Text models	Text models
Free option	no	no
Cheapest provider	trustedrouter	deepinfra

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aiml, deepinfra, edenai, fastrouter, huggingface, kilo, novita, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 62% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro on input price. Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 72% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro on output price. Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 66% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 1M tokens; Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262K tokens.

Where can I use both DeepSeek V4 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

aiml, deepinfra, edenai, fastrouter, huggingface, kilo, novita, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux