AI Rate CardDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: API price and specs
GLM-5.3-Flash is 77% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on input price.
GLM-5.3-Flash is 92% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on output price.
GLM-5.3-Flash is 87% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
GLM-5.3-Flash has a 25% larger context than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813.
| Field | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.12 +327.5% | $0.0269 |
| Median input, per 1M | $1.32 +780% | $0.15 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.29 +1205.3% | $0.0986 |
| Median output, per 1M | $3.96 +692% | $0.50 |
| Lowest unit price | — | $0.033 / request |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.37 +698.8% | $0.04662 |
| Context | 1M +20% | 1.3M |
| Max output | 1M | 1M |
| Providers | 37 +43.1% | 65 |
| Regions | APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US | APAC, EU, FI, GLOBAL, US |
| Accepts | text | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/webm, video/x-matroska |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | openrouter | openrouter |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
abacus, aihubmix, aiml, baseten, cloudflare-workers-ai, cortecs, deepinfra, digitalocean, edenai, empiriolabs, huggingface, hyper, impossibl, io-net, iteracompute, jiekou, kilo, meganova, moark, nebius, novita, ofox, ollama-cloud, openrouter, orcarouter, perplexity, perplexity-agent, poe, requesty, runinfra, siliconflow, standardcompute, tensorx, togetherai, trustedrouter, vercel, volcengine
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GLM-5.3-Flash?
GLM-5.3-Flash is 77% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on input price. GLM-5.3-Flash is 92% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on output price. GLM-5.3-Flash is 87% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GLM-5.3-Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 1M tokens; GLM-5.3-Flash: 1.3M tokens.
Where can I use both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GLM-5.3-Flash?
abacus, aihubmix, aiml, baseten, cloudflare-workers-ai, cortecs, deepinfra, digitalocean, edenai, empiriolabs, huggingface, hyper, impossibl, io-net, iteracompute, jiekou, kilo, meganova, moark, nebius, novita, ofox, ollama-cloud, openrouter, orcarouter, perplexity, perplexity-agent, poe, requesty, runinfra, siliconflow, standardcompute, tensorx, togetherai, trustedrouter, vercel, volcengine