AI Rate CardClaude Fable 5 vs Ling-2.6-flash: API price and specs
Ling-2.6-flash is 100% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on input price.
Ling-2.6-flash is 100% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on output price.
Ling-2.6-flash is 100% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Claude Fable 5 has a 281.5% larger context than Ling-2.6-flash.
| Field | Claude Fable 5 | Ling-2.6-flash |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $3.00 +22976.9% | $0.013 |
| Median input, per 1M | $10.00 +9900% | $0.10 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $18.50 +47335.9% | $0.039 |
| Median output, per 1M | $50.00 +16566.7% | $0.30 |
| Lowest unit price | $0.001 / request | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $6.70 +32111.5% | $0.0208 |
| Context | 1M | 262K +73.8% |
| Max output | 128K | 33K +74.4% |
| Providers | 34 | 5 +85.3% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | xpersona | aiml |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aiml, jiekou, opencode, requesty, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Ling-2.6-flash?
Ling-2.6-flash is 100% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on input price. Ling-2.6-flash is 100% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on output price. Ling-2.6-flash is 100% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Claude Fable 5 or Ling-2.6-flash?
Claude Fable 5: 1M tokens; Ling-2.6-flash: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Claude Fable 5 and Ling-2.6-flash?
aiml, jiekou, opencode, requesty, zenmux