AI Rate CardQwen3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: API price and specs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 54% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on input price.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 51% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on output price.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 53% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen3.8 Flash | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.0975 +116.7% | $0.045 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.15 | $0.30 +100% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.31 +103.7% | $0.15 |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.47 | $1.20 +155.3% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.16 +111.5% | $0.075 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K +87.5% | 1M |
| Providers | 27 +55% | 60 |
| Regions | GLOBAL, US | APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US |
| Accepts | file, image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | edenai | openrouter |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
302ai, aihubmix, aiml, cometapi, deepinfra, edenai, empiriolabs, fastrouter, hyper, impossibl, iteracompute, jiekou, kenari, kilo, moark, novita, ofox, opencode, opencode-go, openrouter, poe, requesty, standardcompute, togetherai, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Flash or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 54% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on input price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 51% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on output price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 53% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 Flash or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash: 1M tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.8 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
302ai, aihubmix, aiml, cometapi, deepinfra, edenai, empiriolabs, fastrouter, hyper, impossibl, iteracompute, jiekou, kenari, kilo, moark, novita, ofox, opencode, opencode-go, openrouter, poe, requesty, standardcompute, togetherai, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux