Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Kimi K3: API price and specs

Kimi K3 is 58% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 26% cheaper than Kimi K3 on output price.

Kimi K3 is 41% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Field	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B	Kimi K3
Lowest input, per 1M	$1.05 +139.8%	$0.44
Median input, per 1M	$2.00	$3.00 +50%
Lowest output, per 1M	$1.20	$1.61 +34.4%
Median output, per 1M	$6.00	$15.00 +150%
Lowest unit price	—	—
Cost of 1M in + 200k out	$1.29 +69.8%	$0.76
Context	1M	1M
Max output	262K +75%	1M
Providers	25 +58.3%	60
Regions	CN, EU, GLOBAL, US	APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US
Accepts	image, text	application/pdf, file, image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/heif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/3gpp, video/avi, video/mov, video/mp4, video/mpeg, video/mpg, video/webm, video/wmv, video/x-flv
Returns	text	text
Type	Text models	Text models
Free option	no	yes
Cheapest provider	trustedrouter	aihubmix

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aihubmix, aiml, cortecs, deepinfra, edenai, fireworks-ai, huggingface, hyper, impossibl, iteracompute, jiekou, kilo, meganova, modal, novita, openrouter, poe, requesty, siliconflow, tensorx, togetherai, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is 58% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 26% cheaper than Kimi K3 on output price. Kimi K3 is 41% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Kimi K3?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1M tokens; Kimi K3: 1M tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Kimi K3?