Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: API price and specs

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 85% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on output price.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 93% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a 300% larger context than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Field	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B	Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Lowest input, per 1M	$1.05 +1658.3%	$0.06
Median input, per 1M	$2.00 +3055.1%	$0.06339
Lowest output, per 1M	$1.20 +566.7%	$0.18
Median output, per 1M	$6.00 +3055.1%	$0.19
Lowest unit price	—	—
Cost of 1M in + 200k out	$1.29 +1249%	$0.096
Context	1M	262K +75%
Max output	262K	33K +87.5%
Providers	25	10 +60%
Regions	CN, EU, GLOBAL, US	US
Accepts	image, text	text
Returns	text	text
Type	Text models	Text models
Free option	no	no
Cheapest provider	trustedrouter	deepinfra

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aiml, deepinfra, edenai, huggingface, kilo, novita, poe, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 94% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on input price. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 85% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on output price. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 93% cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1M tokens; Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

aiml, deepinfra, edenai, huggingface, kilo, novita, poe, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux