AI Rate CardQwen3.6 Plus vs Ling-2.6-1T: API price and specs
Qwen3.6 Plus is 8% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on input price.
Qwen3.6 Plus is 34% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on output price.
Qwen3.6 Plus is 24% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3.6 Plus has a 281.5% larger context than Ling-2.6-1T.
| Field | Qwen3.6 Plus | Ling-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.28 | $0.30 +8.7% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.50 +66.7% | $0.30 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.65 | $2.50 +51.4% |
| Median output, per 1M | $3.00 +20% | $2.50 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.61 | $0.80 +32% |
| Context | 1M | 262K +73.8% |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Providers | 20 | 2 +90% |
| Regions | GLOBAL | — |
| Accepts | image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | yes | no |
| Cheapest provider | empiriolabs | requesty |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or Ling-2.6-1T?
Qwen3.6 Plus is 8% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on input price. Qwen3.6 Plus is 34% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on output price. Qwen3.6 Plus is 24% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.6 Plus or Ling-2.6-1T?
Qwen3.6 Plus: 1M tokens; Ling-2.6-1T: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.6 Plus and Ling-2.6-1T?
requesty, zenmux