AI Rate CardQwen3.6 27B vs Nova Pro 1.0: API price and specs
Qwen3.6 27B is 97% cheaper than Nova Pro 1.0 on input price.
Qwen3.6 27B is 91% cheaper than Nova Pro 1.0 on output price.
Qwen3.6 27B is 94% cheaper than Nova Pro 1.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Nova Pro 1.0 has a 21% larger context than Qwen3.6 27B.
| Field | Qwen3.6 27B | Nova Pro 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.025 | $0.80 +3100% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.40 | $0.85 +110.9% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.28 | $3.20 +1042.9% |
| Median output, per 1M | $3.19 | $3.39 +6.1% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.081 | $1.44 +1677.8% |
| Context | 262K +17.4% | 317K |
| Max output | 262K | 10K +96.2% |
| Providers | 27 | 5 +81.5% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | application/pdf, audio, file, image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/webm | file, image, text, video |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | inferx | kilo |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aiml, cortecs, empiriolabs, kilo, openrouter
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B or Nova Pro 1.0?
Qwen3.6 27B is 97% cheaper than Nova Pro 1.0 on input price. Qwen3.6 27B is 91% cheaper than Nova Pro 1.0 on output price. Qwen3.6 27B is 94% cheaper than Nova Pro 1.0 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.6 27B or Nova Pro 1.0?
Qwen3.6 27B: 262K tokens; Nova Pro 1.0: 317K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.6 27B and Nova Pro 1.0?
aiml, cortecs, empiriolabs, kilo, openrouter