AI Rate CardQwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Kimi K2.6: API price and specs
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is 58% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on input price.
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is 45% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on output price.
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is 52% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.16 | $0.39 +137.2% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.55 | $0.95 +72.7% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.99 | $1.80 +82.5% |
| Median output, per 1M | $3.60 | $4.00 +11.1% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.36 | $0.75 +107.4% |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | 262K |
| Providers | 30 +37.5% | 48 |
| Regions | CH, EU, GLOBAL, US | APAC, CH, EU, GLOBAL, US |
| Accepts | file, image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | file, image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/heif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text, video, video/3gpp, video/avi, video/mov, video/mp4, video/mpeg, video/mpg, video/webm, video/wmv, video/x-flv |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | aihubmix | chutes |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aihubmix, chutes, cortecs, deepinfra, digitalocean, edenai, empiriolabs, fastrouter, huggingface, infomaniak, jiekou, kenari, kilo, nearai, novita, ofox, ollama-cloud, openrouter, orcarouter, poe, requesty, siliconflow, siliconflow-cn, tokengo, trustedrouter
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Kimi K2.6?
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is 58% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on input price. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is 45% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on output price. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is 52% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Kimi K2.6?
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 262K tokens; Kimi K2.6: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.5 397B-A17B and Kimi K2.6?
aihubmix, chutes, cortecs, deepinfra, digitalocean, edenai, empiriolabs, fastrouter, huggingface, infomaniak, jiekou, kenari, kilo, nearai, novita, ofox, ollama-cloud, openrouter, orcarouter, poe, requesty, siliconflow, siliconflow-cn, tokengo, trustedrouter