AI Rate CardQwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Muse Ember: API price and specs
Muse Ember is 39% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on input price.
Muse Ember is 49% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on output price.
Muse Ember is 45% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Muse Ember has a 300% larger context than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B.
| Field | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Muse Ember |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.16 +64.4% | $0.10 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.55 +450% | $0.10 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.99 +97.3% | $0.50 |
| Median output, per 1M | $3.50 +600% | $0.50 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.36 +80.8% | $0.20 |
| Context | 262K +75% | 1M |
| Max output | 262K +72.2% | 944K |
| Providers | 31 | 3 +90.3% |
| Regions | CH, EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | file, image, image/bmp, image/heic, image/jpeg, image/png, image/tiff, image/webp, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-flv, video/x-matroska, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | audio, file, image, pdf, text, video |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | aihubmix | fastrouter |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Muse Ember?
Muse Ember is 39% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on input price. Muse Ember is 49% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on output price. Muse Ember is 45% cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Muse Ember?
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 262K tokens; Muse Ember: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3.5 397B-A17B and Muse Ember?
fastrouter, kenari, kilo