AI Rate CardQwen3 Max vs GLM-4.7: API price and specs
GLM-4.7 is 83% cheaper than Qwen3 Max on input price.
GLM-4.7 is 85% cheaper than Qwen3 Max on output price.
GLM-4.7 is 84% cheaper than Qwen3 Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Qwen3 Max has a 28% larger context than GLM-4.7.
| Field | Qwen3 Max | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.36 +498.3% | $0.06 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.87 +44.2% | $0.60 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.43 +550% | $0.22 |
| Median output, per 1M | $3.46 +57.3% | $2.20 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.65 +520.2% | $0.10 |
| Context | 262K | 205K +21.9% |
| Max output | 66K +67.2% | 200K |
| Providers | 12 +60% | 30 |
| Regions | US | APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US |
| Accepts | image, text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | yes |
| Cheapest provider | orcarouter | aihubmix |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
302ai, aihubmix, alibaba-coding-plan, alibaba-coding-plan-cn, deepinfra, edenai, kilo, ofox, orcarouter, qiniu-ai, requesty, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Max or GLM-4.7?
GLM-4.7 is 83% cheaper than Qwen3 Max on input price. GLM-4.7 is 85% cheaper than Qwen3 Max on output price. GLM-4.7 is 84% cheaper than Qwen3 Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen3 Max or GLM-4.7?
Qwen3 Max: 262K tokens; GLM-4.7: 205K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen3 Max and GLM-4.7?
302ai, aihubmix, alibaba-coding-plan, alibaba-coding-plan-cn, deepinfra, edenai, kilo, ofox, orcarouter, qiniu-ai, requesty, zenmux