AI Rate Card

Qwen3 Max vs Ling-2.6-1T: API price and specs

Ling-2.6-1T is 16% cheaper than Qwen3 Max on input price.

Qwen3 Max is 43% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on output price.

Qwen3 Max is 19% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

FieldQwen3 MaxLing-2.6-1T
Lowest input, per 1M$0.36 +19.7%$0.30
Median input, per 1M$0.87 +188.4%$0.30
Lowest output, per 1M$1.43$2.50 +74.8%
Median output, per 1M$3.46 +38.4%$2.50
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.65$0.80 +24%
Context262K262K
Max output66K—
Providers122 +83.3%
RegionsUS—
Acceptsimage, texttext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providerorcarouterrequesty

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

requesty, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Max or Ling-2.6-1T?

Ling-2.6-1T is 16% cheaper than Qwen3 Max on input price. Qwen3 Max is 43% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on output price. Qwen3 Max is 19% cheaper than Ling-2.6-1T on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen3 Max or Ling-2.6-1T?

Qwen3 Max: 262K tokens; Ling-2.6-1T: 262K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen3 Max and Ling-2.6-1T?

requesty, zenmux