AI Rate Card

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct vs Ultramarine 1 Flash: API price and specs

Ultramarine 1 Flash is 35% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on input price.

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 20% cheaper than Ultramarine 1 Flash on output price.

Ultramarine 1 Flash is 19% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Ultramarine 1 Flash has a 700% larger context than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct.

FieldQwen 2.5 72B InstructUltramarine 1 Flash
Lowest input, per 1M$0.23 +53.3%$0.15
Median input, per 1M$0.36 +92%$0.19
Lowest output, per 1M$0.40$0.50 +25%
Median output, per 1M$0.40$0.62 +56.2%
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.31 +24%$0.25
Context131K +87.5%1M
Max output16K +87.5%131K
Providers122 +83.3%
RegionsUS—
Acceptstextimage, text
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providerrequestykilo

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

kilo, requesty

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or Ultramarine 1 Flash?

Ultramarine 1 Flash is 35% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on input price. Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct is 20% cheaper than Ultramarine 1 Flash on output price. Ultramarine 1 Flash is 19% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct or Ultramarine 1 Flash?

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct: 131K tokens; Ultramarine 1 Flash: 1M tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct and Ultramarine 1 Flash?

kilo, requesty