AI Rate Card

Qwen Max vs GLM-4.7: API price and specs

GLM-4.7 is 83% cheaper than Qwen Max on input price.

GLM-4.7 is 84% cheaper than Qwen Max on output price.

GLM-4.7 is 83% cheaper than Qwen Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

GLM-4.7 has a 60% larger context than Qwen Max.

FieldQwen MaxGLM-4.7
Lowest input, per 1M$0.35 +479.7%$0.06
Median input, per 1M$0.71 +18.3%$0.60
Lowest output, per 1M$1.38 +527.3%$0.22
Median output, per 1M$2.84 +29.1%$2.20
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.62 +499.8%$0.10
Context128K +37.5%205K
Max output8K +96%200K
Providers7 +76.7%30
RegionsGLOBALAPAC, EU, GLOBAL, US
Acceptstexttext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnoyes
Cheapest providerqiniu-aiaihubmix

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aihubmix, aiml, edenai, moark, ofox, qiniu-ai, requesty

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 is 83% cheaper than Qwen Max on input price. GLM-4.7 is 84% cheaper than Qwen Max on output price. GLM-4.7 is 83% cheaper than Qwen Max on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Qwen Max or GLM-4.7?

Qwen Max: 128K tokens; GLM-4.7: 205K tokens.

Where can I use both Qwen Max and GLM-4.7?

aihubmix, aiml, edenai, moark, ofox, qiniu-ai, requesty