AI Rate CardQwen Max vs Kimi K2.5: API price and specs
Qwen Max is 23% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on input price.
Kimi K2.5 is 13% cheaper than Qwen Max on output price.
Qwen Max is 10% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Kimi K2.5 has a 104.8% larger context than Qwen Max.
| Field | Qwen Max | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.35 | $0.45 +29.4% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.71 +18.3% | $0.60 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.38 +15% | $1.20 |
| Median output, per 1M | $2.84 | $3.00 +5.6% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.62 | $0.69 +10.6% |
| Context | 128K +51.2% | 262K |
| Max output | 8K +96.9% | 262K |
| Providers | 7 +81.6% | 38 |
| Regions | GLOBAL | EU, GLOBAL, US |
| Accepts | text | image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/heic, image/heif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text, video, video/3gpp, video/avi, video/mov, video/mp4, video/mpeg, video/mpg, video/webm, video/wmv, video/x-flv |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | qiniu-ai | deepinfra |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aihubmix, aiml, edenai, moark, ofox, qiniu-ai, requesty
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or Kimi K2.5?
Qwen Max is 23% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on input price. Kimi K2.5 is 13% cheaper than Qwen Max on output price. Qwen Max is 10% cheaper than Kimi K2.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Qwen Max or Kimi K2.5?
Qwen Max: 128K tokens; Kimi K2.5: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both Qwen Max and Kimi K2.5?
aihubmix, aiml, edenai, moark, ofox, qiniu-ai, requesty