AI Rate Card

Agnes 2.0 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: API price and specs

Agnes 2.0 Flash is 90% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on input price.

Agnes 2.0 Flash is 90% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on output price.

Agnes 2.0 Flash is 90% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 290.6% larger context than Agnes 2.0 Flash.

FieldAgnes 2.0 FlashClaude Sonnet 4.6
Lowest input, per 1M$0.015$0.15 +900%
Median input, per 1M$0.015$3.00 +19900%
Lowest output, per 1M$0.075$0.75 +900%
Median output, per 1M$0.075$15.00 +19900%
Lowest unit price—$0.001 / request
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.03$0.30 +900%
Context256K +74.4%1M
Max output—128K
Providers2 +94.4%36
Regions—APAC, AU, EU, GLOBAL, JP, US
Accepts—application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text
Returns—text
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionyesno
Cheapest providerdaoxedaoxe

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

daoxe, kenari

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Agnes 2.0 Flash or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Agnes 2.0 Flash is 90% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on input price. Agnes 2.0 Flash is 90% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on output price. Agnes 2.0 Flash is 90% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Agnes 2.0 Flash or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Agnes 2.0 Flash: 256K tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.6: 1M tokens.

Where can I use both Agnes 2.0 Flash and Claude Sonnet 4.6?

daoxe, kenari