MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash: API price and specs
GLM-5.3-Flash is 66% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on input price.
GLM-5.3-Flash is 38% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on output price.
GLM-5.3-Flash is 58% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
GLM-5.3-Flash has a 24.8% larger context than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
| Field | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.08 +197.4% | $0.0269 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.14 | $0.15 +7.1% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.16 +62.3% | $0.0986 |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.28 | $0.50 +78.6% |
| Lowest unit price | — | $0.033 / request |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.11 +140.2% | $0.04662 |
| Context | 1.1M +19.9% | 1.3M |
| Max output | 131K +87.5% | 1M |
| Providers | 25 +61.5% | 65 |
| Regions | APAC, US | APAC, EU, FI, GLOBAL, US |
| Accepts | audio, audio/flac, audio/mp4, audio/mpeg, audio/ogg, audio/wav, file, image, image/bmp, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/x-ms-wmv, video/x-msvideo | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text, video, video/mp4, video/quicktime, video/webm, video/x-matroska |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | yes | yes |
| Cheapest provider | aihubmix | openrouter |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aihubmix, aiml, cometapi, deepinfra, edenai, empiriolabs, fastrouter, impossibl, io-net, kenari, kilo, meganova, novita, ollama, ollama-cloud, opencode, opencode-go, openrouter, poe, requesty, trustedrouter, vercel, vultr, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or GLM-5.3-Flash?
GLM-5.3-Flash is 66% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on input price. GLM-5.3-Flash is 38% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on output price. GLM-5.3-Flash is 58% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or GLM-5.3-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1.1M tokens; GLM-5.3-Flash: 1.3M tokens.
Where can I use both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash?
aihubmix, aiml, cometapi, deepinfra, edenai, empiriolabs, fastrouter, impossibl, io-net, kenari, kilo, meganova, novita, ollama, ollama-cloud, opencode, opencode-go, openrouter, poe, requesty, trustedrouter, vercel, vultr, zenmux