AI Rate Card

Step 2 (16K) vs Step 3.7 Flash: API price and specs

Step 3.7 Flash is 90% cheaper than Step 2 (16K) on input price.

Step 3.7 Flash is 43% cheaper than Step 2 (16K) on output price.

Step 3.7 Flash is 83% cheaper than Step 2 (16K) on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Step 3.7 Flash has a 1500% larger context than Step 2 (16K).

FieldStep 2 (16K)Step 3.7 Flash
Lowest input, per 1M$2.00 +952.6%$0.19
Median input, per 1M$5.21 +2505%$0.20
Lowest output, per 1M$2.00 +75.4%$1.14
Median output, per 1M$16.44 +1329.6%$1.15
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$2.40 +474.2%$0.42
Context16K +93.8%262K
Max output8K +96.9%262K
Providers3 +84.2%19
Regions—GLOBAL, US
Acceptstextfile, image, text, video
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest provideraihubmixambient

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aihubmix, stepfun, stepfun-ai

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Step 2 (16K) or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is 90% cheaper than Step 2 (16K) on input price. Step 3.7 Flash is 43% cheaper than Step 2 (16K) on output price. Step 3.7 Flash is 83% cheaper than Step 2 (16K) on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Step 2 (16K) or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 2 (16K): 16K tokens; Step 3.7 Flash: 262K tokens.

Where can I use both Step 2 (16K) and Step 3.7 Flash?

aihubmix, stepfun, stepfun-ai