AI Rate Cardstep-1o-turbo-vision vs Step 3.5 Flash: API price and specs
Step 3.5 Flash is 75% cheaper than step-1o-turbo-vision on input price.
Step 3.5 Flash is 74% cheaper than step-1o-turbo-vision on output price.
Step 3.5 Flash is 75% cheaper than step-1o-turbo-vision on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | step-1o-turbo-vision | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.36 +300% | $0.09 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.37 +267.3% | $0.10 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $1.15 +283.3% | $0.30 |
| Median output, per 1M | $1.17 +291.5% | $0.30 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.59 +293.3% | $0.15 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Providers | 2 +84.6% | 13 |
| Regions | — | US |
| Accepts | — | text |
| Returns | — | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | stepfun-ai | deepinfra |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, step-1o-turbo-vision or Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is 75% cheaper than step-1o-turbo-vision on input price. Step 3.5 Flash is 74% cheaper than step-1o-turbo-vision on output price. Step 3.5 Flash is 75% cheaper than step-1o-turbo-vision on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Where can I use both step-1o-turbo-vision and Step 3.5 Flash?
stepfun, stepfun-ai