AI Rate CardGPT-Image-1.5 vs GPT Image 2.5 Flare: API price and specs
GPT-Image-1.5 is 67% cheaper than GPT Image 2.5 Flare on output price.
GPT-Image-1.5 is 36% cheaper than GPT Image 2.5 Flare on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | GPT-Image-1.5 | GPT Image 2.5 Flare |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $4.00 | $4.00 |
| Median input, per 1M | $5.00 | $5.00 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $8.00 | $24.00 +200% |
| Median output, per 1M | $10.00 | $30.00 +200% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $5.60 | $8.80 +57.1% |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 4K |
| Providers | 11 +15.4% | 13 |
| Regions | — | — |
| Accepts | image, text | image, text |
| Returns | image, text | image |
| Type | Images | Images |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | cometapi | cometapi |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aihubmix, aiml, cometapi, fastrouter, ofox, openai, vercel, zenmux
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-Image-1.5 or GPT Image 2.5 Flare?
GPT-Image-1.5 is 67% cheaper than GPT Image 2.5 Flare on output price. GPT-Image-1.5 is 36% cheaper than GPT Image 2.5 Flare on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, GPT-Image-1.5 or GPT Image 2.5 Flare?
GPT-Image-1.5: 128K tokens; GPT Image 2.5 Flare: 128K tokens.
Where can I use both GPT-Image-1.5 and GPT Image 2.5 Flare?
aihubmix, aiml, cometapi, fastrouter, ofox, openai, vercel, zenmux