GPT-Image-1 vs GPT-Image-1.5: API price and specs
GPT-Image-1.5 is 20% cheaper than GPT-Image-1 on input price.
GPT-Image-1.5 is 36% cheaper than GPT-Image-1 on output price.
GPT-Image-1.5 is 25% cheaper than GPT-Image-1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
| Field | GPT-Image-1 | GPT-Image-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $5.00 +25% | $4.00 |
| Median input, per 1M | $5.00 | $5.00 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $12.50 +56.2% | $8.00 |
| Median output, per 1M | $40.00 +300% | $10.00 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $7.50 +33.9% | $5.60 |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 4K |
| Providers | 8 +27.3% | 11 |
| Regions | — | — |
| Accepts | image, text | image, text |
| Returns | image | image, text |
| Type | Images | Images |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | aihubmix | cometapi |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aihubmix, azure, cometapi, digitalocean, fastrouter, helicone, openai, vercel
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-Image-1 or GPT-Image-1.5?
GPT-Image-1.5 is 20% cheaper than GPT-Image-1 on input price. GPT-Image-1.5 is 36% cheaper than GPT-Image-1 on output price. GPT-Image-1.5 is 25% cheaper than GPT-Image-1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, GPT-Image-1 or GPT-Image-1.5?
GPT-Image-1: 128K tokens; GPT-Image-1.5: 128K tokens.
Where can I use both GPT-Image-1 and GPT-Image-1.5?
aihubmix, azure, cometapi, digitalocean, fastrouter, helicone, openai, vercel