AI Rate CardGPT-4.1 nano vs GPT-Audio-1.5: API price and specs
GPT-4.1 nano is 98% cheaper than GPT-Audio-1.5 on input price.
GPT-4.1 nano is 98% cheaper than GPT-Audio-1.5 on output price.
GPT-4.1 nano is 98% cheaper than GPT-Audio-1.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
GPT-4.1 nano has a 718.4% larger context than GPT-Audio-1.5.
| Field | GPT-4.1 nano | GPT-Audio-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.05 | $2.00 +3900% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.10 | $2.50 +2400% |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.20 | $8.00 +3900% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.40 | $10.00 +2400% |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.09 | $3.60 +3900% |
| Context | 1M | 128K +87.8% |
| Max output | 943K | 16K +98.3% |
| Providers | 21 | 4 +81% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text | audio, text |
| Returns | text | audio, text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | openrouter | cometapi |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
abacus, aihubmix, cometapi, openai
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or GPT-Audio-1.5?
GPT-4.1 nano is 98% cheaper than GPT-Audio-1.5 on input price. GPT-4.1 nano is 98% cheaper than GPT-Audio-1.5 on output price. GPT-4.1 nano is 98% cheaper than GPT-Audio-1.5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, GPT-4.1 nano or GPT-Audio-1.5?
GPT-4.1 nano: 1M tokens; GPT-Audio-1.5: 128K tokens.
Where can I use both GPT-4.1 nano and GPT-Audio-1.5?
abacus, aihubmix, cometapi, openai