AI Rate CardMercury 2.5 vs Mercury 3: API price and specs
Mercury 2.5 is 60% cheaper than Mercury 3 on input price.
Mercury 2.5 is 57% cheaper than Mercury 3 on output price.
Mercury 2.5 is 59% cheaper than Mercury 3 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Mercury 3 has a 284.6% larger context than Mercury 2.5.
| Field | Mercury 2.5 | Mercury 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.04 | $0.10 +150% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.20 +94.6% | $0.10 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.15 | $0.35 +133.3% |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.75 +108.6% | $0.36 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.07 | $0.17 +142.9% |
| Context | 260K +74% | 1M |
| Max output | 66K +50% | 131K |
| Providers | 7 | 6 +14.3% |
| Regions | US | US |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | openrouter | inception |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aiml, inception, kilo, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2.5 or Mercury 3?
Mercury 2.5 is 60% cheaper than Mercury 3 on input price. Mercury 2.5 is 57% cheaper than Mercury 3 on output price. Mercury 2.5 is 59% cheaper than Mercury 3 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Mercury 2.5 or Mercury 3?
Mercury 2.5: 260K tokens; Mercury 3: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Mercury 2.5 and Mercury 3?
aiml, inception, kilo, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel