Mercury 2 vs Mercury 3: API price and specs
Mercury 3 is 60% cheaper than Mercury 2 on input price.
Mercury 3 is 53% cheaper than Mercury 2 on output price.
Mercury 3 is 57% cheaper than Mercury 2 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Mercury 3 has a 681.2% larger context than Mercury 2.
| Field | Mercury 2 | Mercury 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.25 +150% | $0.10 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.25 +143.3% | $0.10 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.75 +114.3% | $0.35 |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.75 +108.6% | $0.36 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.40 +135.3% | $0.17 |
| Context | 128K +87.2% | 1M |
| Max output | 128K +2.3% | 131K |
| Providers | 6 | 6 |
| Regions | US | US |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | inception | inception |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aiml, inception, kilo, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is 60% cheaper than Mercury 2 on input price. Mercury 3 is 53% cheaper than Mercury 2 on output price. Mercury 3 is 57% cheaper than Mercury 2 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Mercury 2 or Mercury 3?
Mercury 2: 128K tokens; Mercury 3: 1M tokens.
Where can I use both Mercury 2 and Mercury 3?
aiml, inception, kilo, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel