AI Rate CardMercury 2 vs Mercury 2.5: API price and specs
Mercury 2.5 is 84% cheaper than Mercury 2 on input price.
Mercury 2.5 is 80% cheaper than Mercury 2 on output price.
Mercury 2.5 is 82% cheaper than Mercury 2 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Mercury 2.5 has a 103.1% larger context than Mercury 2.
| Field | Mercury 2 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.25 +525% | $0.04 |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.25 +25% | $0.20 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.75 +400% | $0.15 |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.75 | $0.75 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.40 +471.4% | $0.07 |
| Context | 128K +50.8% | 260K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K +48.8% |
| Providers | 6 +14.3% | 7 |
| Regions | US | US |
| Accepts | text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | inception | openrouter |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
aiml, inception, kilo, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Mercury 2.5?
Mercury 2.5 is 84% cheaper than Mercury 2 on input price. Mercury 2.5 is 80% cheaper than Mercury 2 on output price. Mercury 2.5 is 82% cheaper than Mercury 2 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Mercury 2 or Mercury 2.5?
Mercury 2: 128K tokens; Mercury 2.5: 260K tokens.
Where can I use both Mercury 2 and Mercury 2.5?
aiml, inception, kilo, openrouter, trustedrouter, vercel