Veo-3 vs Kling 4.0: API price and specs
Kling 4.0 has a 9665.6% larger context than Veo-3.
| Field | Veo-3 | Kling 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | — | $60.00 |
| Median input, per 1M | — | $60.00 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | — | — |
| Median output, per 1M | — | — |
| Lowest unit price | $0.20 / second | $0.67 / second +236.6% |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | — | — |
| Context | 4K +99% | 400K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Providers | 2 | 2 |
| Regions | — | — |
| Accepts | image, text | audio, image, text, video |
| Returns | video | video |
| Type | Video | Video |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | — | cometapi |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which has the larger context, Veo-3 or Kling 4.0?
Veo-3: 4K tokens; Kling 4.0: 400K tokens.
Where can I use both Veo-3 and Kling 4.0?
cometapi, fastrouter