DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs umans-flash: API price and specs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 70% cheaper than umans-flash on input price.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 75% cheaper than umans-flash on output price.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 72% cheaper than umans-flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a 300% larger context than umans-flash.
| Field | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | umans-flash |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $0.045 | $0.15 +233.3% |
| Median input, per 1M | $0.30 +100% | $0.15 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.15 | $0.60 +300% |
| Median output, per 1M | $1.20 +20% | $1.00 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $0.075 | $0.27 +260% |
| Context | 1M | 262K +75% |
| Max output | 1M | 262K +75% |
| Providers | 60 | 2 +96.7% |
| Regions | APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text | image, text |
| Returns | text | — |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | yes | no |
| Cheapest provider | openrouter | umans-ai-coding-plan |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
umans-ai, umans-ai-coding-plan
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or umans-flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 70% cheaper than umans-flash on input price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 75% cheaper than umans-flash on output price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 72% cheaper than umans-flash on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or umans-flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1M tokens; umans-flash: 262K tokens.
Where can I use both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and umans-flash?
umans-ai, umans-ai-coding-plan