DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: API price and specs

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 25% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin on input price.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 17% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin on output price.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 22% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a 300% larger context than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Field	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Lowest input, per 1M	$0.045	$0.06 +33.3%
Median input, per 1M	$0.30 +373.3%	$0.06339
Lowest output, per 1M	$0.15	$0.18 +20%
Median output, per 1M	$1.20 +531%	$0.19
Lowest unit price	—	—
Cost of 1M in + 200k out	$0.075	$0.096 +28%
Context	1M	262K +75%
Max output	1M	33K +96.9%
Providers	60	10 +83.3%
Regions	APAC, EU, GLOBAL, US	US
Accepts	application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text	text
Returns	text	text
Type	Text models	Text models
Free option	yes	no
Cheapest provider	openrouter	deepinfra

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

aiml, deepinfra, edenai, huggingface, kilo, novita, poe, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 25% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin on input price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 17% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin on output price. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 22% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1M tokens; Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262K tokens.

Where can I use both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

aiml, deepinfra, edenai, huggingface, kilo, novita, poe, trustedrouter, vercel, zenmux