AI Rate Card

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Phi-4: API price and specs

Phi-4 is 75% cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 on input price.

Phi-4 is 66% cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 on output price.

Phi-4 is 73% cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

DeepSeek V3.2 has a 28.1% larger context than Phi-4.

FieldDeepSeek V3.2Phi-4
Lowest input, per 1M$0.22 +292.9%$0.056
Median input, per 1M$0.30 +328.6%$0.07
Lowest output, per 1M$0.33 +194.6%$0.11
Median output, per 1M$0.50 +257.1%$0.14
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$0.29 +264.8%$0.0784
Context164K128K +22%
Max output164K15K +91%
Providers2910 +65.5%
RegionsEU, GLOBAL, USUS
Acceptstexttext
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest providertokengokilo

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

azure, deepinfra, edenai, fastrouter, huggingface, impossibl, kilo, openrouter, requesty, trustedrouter

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is 75% cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 on input price. Phi-4 is 66% cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 on output price. Phi-4 is 73% cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, DeepSeek V3.2 or Phi-4?

DeepSeek V3.2: 164K tokens; Phi-4: 128K tokens.

Where can I use both DeepSeek V3.2 and Phi-4?

azure, deepinfra, edenai, fastrouter, huggingface, impossibl, kilo, openrouter, requesty, trustedrouter