FLUX.2 [flex] vs FLUX.2 [pro]: API price and specs
FLUX.2 [pro] is 40% cheaper than FLUX.2 [flex] on output price.
| Field | FLUX.2 [flex] | FLUX.2 [pro] |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | — | — |
| Median input, per 1M | — | — |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $0.05 +66.7% | $0.03 |
| Median output, per 1M | $0.05 +66.7% | $0.03 |
| Lowest unit price | $0.06 / image +300% | $0.015 / image |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | — | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Providers | 3 +25% | 4 |
| Regions | — | — |
| Accepts | — | — |
| Returns | — | — |
| Type | Images | Images |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | — | — |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, FLUX.2 [flex] or FLUX.2 [pro]?
FLUX.2 [pro] is 40% cheaper than FLUX.2 [flex] on output price.
Where can I use both FLUX.2 [flex] and FLUX.2 [pro]?
aiml, cometapi, siliconflow