Claude Opus 4.7 vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus: API price and specs
Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 97% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 on input price.
Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 97% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 on output price.
Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 97% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Claude Opus 4.7 has a 3100% larger context than Phi-4-reasoning-plus.
| Field | Claude Opus 4.7 | Phi-4-reasoning-plus |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $2.50 +3471.4% | $0.07 |
| Median input, per 1M | $5.00 +5028.2% | $0.0975 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $12.50 +3471.4% | $0.35 |
| Median output, per 1M | $25.00 +5782.4% | $0.42 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $5.00 +3471.4% | $0.14 |
| Context | 1M | 33K +96.9% |
| Max output | 128K | 4K +96.8% |
| Providers | 33 | 2 +93.9% |
| Regions | AU, EU, GLOBAL, JP, US | — |
| Accepts | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | openrouter | deepinfra |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Phi-4-reasoning-plus?
Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 97% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 on input price. Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 97% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 on output price. Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 97% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Claude Opus 4.7 or Phi-4-reasoning-plus?
Claude Opus 4.7: 1M tokens; Phi-4-reasoning-plus: 33K tokens.
Where can I use both Claude Opus 4.7 and Phi-4-reasoning-plus?
azure, deepinfra