Claude Fable 5 vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus: API price and specs
Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 98% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on input price.
Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 98% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on output price.
Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 98% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Claude Fable 5 has a 2951.8% larger context than Phi-4-reasoning-plus.
| Field | Claude Fable 5 | Phi-4-reasoning-plus |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $3.00 +4185.7% | $0.07 |
| Median input, per 1M | $10.00 +10156.4% | $0.0975 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $18.50 +5185.7% | $0.35 |
| Median output, per 1M | $50.00 +11664.7% | $0.42 |
| Lowest unit price | $0.001 / request | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $6.70 +4685.7% | $0.14 |
| Context | 1M | 33K +96.7% |
| Max output | 128K | 4K +96.8% |
| Providers | 34 | 2 +94.1% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | xpersona | deepinfra |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Phi-4-reasoning-plus?
Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 98% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on input price. Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 98% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on output price. Phi-4-reasoning-plus is 98% cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Claude Fable 5 or Phi-4-reasoning-plus?
Claude Fable 5: 1M tokens; Phi-4-reasoning-plus: 33K tokens.
Where can I use both Claude Fable 5 and Phi-4-reasoning-plus?
azure, deepinfra