AI Rate Card

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Mistral Medium 3: API price and specs

Mistral Medium 3 is 92% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on input price.

Mistral Medium 3 is 92% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on output price.

Mistral Medium 3 is 92% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Claude Fable 5.1 has a 662.9% larger context than Mistral Medium 3.

FieldClaude Fable 5.1Mistral Medium 3
Lowest input, per 1M$5.00 +1150%$0.40
Median input, per 1M$10.00 +2281%$0.42
Lowest output, per 1M$25.00 +1150%$2.00
Median output, per 1M$50.00 +2281%$2.10
Lowest unit price——
Cost of 1M in + 200k out$10.00 +1150%$0.80
Context1M131K +86.9%
Max output128K128K
Providers303 +90%
RegionsEU, GLOBAL, USEU, GLOBAL
Acceptsapplication/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, textimage, text
Returnstexttext
TypeText modelsText models
Free optionnono
Cheapest provideriteracomputeazure

Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.

Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.

Providers selling both

azure, edenai

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Mistral Medium 3?

Mistral Medium 3 is 92% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on input price. Mistral Medium 3 is 92% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on output price. Mistral Medium 3 is 92% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.

Which has the larger context, Claude Fable 5.1 or Mistral Medium 3?

Claude Fable 5.1: 1M tokens; Mistral Medium 3: 131K tokens.

Where can I use both Claude Fable 5.1 and Mistral Medium 3?

azure, edenai