Claude Fable 5.1 vs Phi-4-mini-reasoning: API price and specs
Phi-4-mini-reasoning is 98% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on input price.
Phi-4-mini-reasoning is 100% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on output price.
Phi-4-mini-reasoning is 99% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Claude Fable 5.1 has a 681.2% larger context than Phi-4-mini-reasoning.
| Field | Claude Fable 5.1 | Phi-4-mini-reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest input, per 1M | $5.00 +6566.7% | $0.075 |
| Median input, per 1M | $10.00 +10156.4% | $0.0975 |
| Lowest output, per 1M | $25.00 +20733.3% | $0.12 |
| Median output, per 1M | $50.00 +23709.5% | $0.21 |
| Lowest unit price | — | — |
| Cost of 1M in + 200k out | $10.00 +10001% | $0.099 |
| Context | 1M | 128K +87.2% |
| Max output | 128K | 4K +96.8% |
| Providers | 30 | 2 +93.3% |
| Regions | EU, GLOBAL, US | — |
| Accepts | application/pdf, file, image, image/gif, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, pdf, text | text |
| Returns | text | text |
| Type | Text models | Text models |
| Free option | no | no |
| Cheapest provider | iteracompute | azure |
Your own workload: how many tokens the model gets (input) and gives back (output) - for example, in a month. The "Cost" row of the table above is recalculated for these numbers, for each model.
Computed from current offers each time the page opens; the best value of a row is bold, the percent is how far behind the best.
Providers selling both
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Phi-4-mini-reasoning?
Phi-4-mini-reasoning is 98% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on input price. Phi-4-mini-reasoning is 100% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on output price. Phi-4-mini-reasoning is 99% cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a 1M-in / 200k-out workload.
Which has the larger context, Claude Fable 5.1 or Phi-4-mini-reasoning?
Claude Fable 5.1: 1M tokens; Phi-4-mini-reasoning: 128K tokens.
Where can I use both Claude Fable 5.1 and Phi-4-mini-reasoning?
aihubmix, azure